Paul Thomas Anderson’s “One Battle After Another” won the most prestigious award for a film, Best Picture at the Oscars.
The film has been deemed a modern classic by many and won over films like “Bugonia,” “Train Dreams” and “Hamnet.” However the most obvious film it won over, and snubbed in the process, was Coogler’s “Sinners.”
“One Battle After Another” was amazing, and I thought it was one of the more important films of the century. Despite it not being based on a real event, it really captures some important things that are currently happening in the country.
I found its commentary on the usage of government agencies and resources to do dirty work quite scary, but realistic nonetheless. It’s great.
However, I have a hard time grasping how it won, as a film, over “Sinners.”
From a filmmaking standpoint, “Sinners” clears. It’s better acted, more nuanced and has an all-time directing performance from Coogler.
The themes in “Sinners” moved me because it really connects to the human spirit. The most famous scene in the movie even highlights that when “I Lied To You” starts playing – which was nominated for Original Song but lost to “Golden.”
There’s nothing, in my opinion, that “One Battle After Another” did better than “Sinners.”
Coogler ran circles around his competition and it’s a shame, and a disservice, that the Academy didn’t award him for the accomplishment that is “Sinners.”
