Fresno State's student-run newspaper

The Collegian

ADVERTISEMENT
Fresno State's student-run newspaper

The Collegian

Fresno State's student-run newspaper

The Collegian

Legislature dooms our future

Each of us is familiar with our state̢۪s grim economic situation. Indeed, no Californian is unaffected by the financial upheaval we have experienced in recent years. One of the areas hit hardest is one that has the ability to pull us out of this mess: education.

The California Legislature, however, has decided to neglect higher education, and the resulting financial burden has fallen on the shoulders of students, faculty, and staff of the University of California, the California State University, and Community College systems. Our governing boards are being forced to make undesirable changes that will devastate future of California.

UC is already saddled with a shortfall of over $637 million during 2009-2010 — approximately twenty percent less state funding than appropriated for 2007-2008 — as well as a $335 million gap related to increasing costs for which the state has provided no funding over the two-year period. Similarly, the CSU faces an equally unprecedented budget shortfall of $584 million and CCC spending has been reduced by more than $680 million for 2009-2010 fiscal year.

The California Legislature is impairing access, affordability, and quality in all three segments of higher education:

Access is threatened. This year, our community colleges will be forced to turn away more than 250,000 students. And where are they to go? UC? CSU? The workforce? None of these is a viable option—for both economic and political reasons. At UC, freshman enrollment was reduced by 2,300 students this fall, and options are being developed to further curtail freshmen enrollment. The CSU faces a system-wide reduction in student enrollment of 40,000 in addition to an increase in barriers to students — earlier application deadlines, the requirements of enrollment deposits, and the termination of Spring 2010 admission. These barriers pose increased challenges to educationally and economically disadvantaged Californians seeking access to higher education.

Affordability is threatened. Since the year 2000, student tuition and fees have increased a soaring 215% within UC, 280% within CSU, and 235% among community college systems. These figures are not matched with corresponding increases in education spending. Instead, the California Legislature increasingly places the burden of financing education on students, who must come up with the resources that the state is unwilling to garner.

Quality is threatened. Within all three segments of higher education, student services are being reduced, classes are being eliminated, and class sizes increased — each negatively impacting the quality of the educational experience. To deal with state reductions, the UC Regents and CSU Trustees were forced to adopt furlough plans, reducing salaries of our already underpaid faculty, staff, and administrators and contributing to the potential loss of some of the greatest minds in the world to our competitor institutions. Local community college districts are undergoing a similar process to reduce salaries of faculty and staff. The diminished quality of postsecondary education in California is further exacerbated by reductions that force campuses across the state to make dramatic cuts in student services.

Our Legislature has effectively continued to abandon the greatest public higher education systems in the world. Our state has lost sight of the vision of its Master Plan for Higher Education and has significantly threatened educational opportunity and excellence for all Californians. Both the state and our elected officials must be reminded that education is an investment and an engine for economic and social mobility. Our schools have the capacity to foster scientific and humanitarian research as well as to promote service to the state and country. In order for the state to remain competitive, it must reinvest in education.

While the state pits our segments against one another economically, today we stand together with a common message. Collectively, we call on all Californians to protect our education and the institutions that drive our economy, culture, and everything that makes our state so great. As the 2010 election approaches, partner with us to vote for an affordable, accessible, high-quality education.

Russel D. Statham is the Student Trustee for the California State University.
Jesse M. Bernal is the Student Regent for the University of California.
Richael Young is the former Student Senate President of the California Community College system.

View Comments (6)
Donate to The Collegian
$100
$500
Contributed
Our Goal

Your donation will support the student journalists of Fresno State Your contribution will allow us to purchase equipment and cover our annual website hosting costs.

Donate to The Collegian
$100
$500
Contributed
Our Goal

Comments (6)

All The Collegian Picks Reader Picks Sort: Newest

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  • F

    fyiSep 21, 2009 at 6:37 pm

    agree with harper…a new order is slowly taking place and people are turning a blind eye

    Reply
  • F

    fyiSep 22, 2009 at 1:37 am

    agree with harper…a new order is slowly taking place and people are turning a blind eye

    Reply
  • J

    Jared HarperSep 15, 2009 at 9:20 pm

    “weed out students” is code word for “get rid of the poor and colored people. It is institutionalized racism and no one dares talk about it. But thats what is i think, maybe im over thinking and racism went away during civil rights movement.

    Reply
  • J

    Jared HarperSep 16, 2009 at 4:20 am

    “weed out students” is code word for “get rid of the poor and colored people. It is institutionalized racism and no one dares talk about it. But thats what is i think, maybe im over thinking and racism went away during civil rights movement.

    Reply
  • J

    JasmineSep 11, 2009 at 12:40 am

    There’s something so disturbing about reading the words “an increase in barriers to students”. It seems so counter intuitive to progress. I’ve heard people saying things like ‘we have to weed out students’, and it just feels so wrong. Is this where we are headed.. an increased exclusivity of higher education? *sigh* It’s very distressing.

    Reply
  • J

    JasmineSep 11, 2009 at 7:40 am

    There’s something so disturbing about reading the words “an increase in barriers to students”. It seems so counter intuitive to progress. I’ve heard people saying things like ‘we have to weed out students’, and it just feels so wrong. Is this where we are headed.. an increased exclusivity of higher education? *sigh* It’s very distressing.

    Reply