Fresno State President John D. Welty and the CSU Board of Trustees are among those that have chosen to endorse Propositions 1A through 1E for the May 19 statewide special election.
The League of Women Voters of California and the California Faculty Association, respectively, are among those in opposition, specifically to Prop. 1A.
CSU trustees said that given the fiscal crisis in the state, the measures were necessary to help solve a critical cash flow problem without precedent in California history.
“These measures are designed to bring much needed cash revenue to the state and will serve the CSU system well,â€Â Trustee Bill Hauck said in a California State University news release on March 25.
According to President Welty, the passage would help stabilize the budget in the state of California.
It will not solve all of the problems, he said, but it is an important step that is important for higher education.
“For the 2009-10 year, it means that there is funding that will flow into the state budget in a matter of about $6 billion, which is part of the budget package that was passed in February,â€Â Welty told The Collegian.
“If they don’t pass, then there would be an immediate $6 billion deficit in the state budget on top of what some believe is about $8 billion.â€Â
Alice Sunshine, communications director with CFA, was one of four people who spoke against Proposition 1A during a statewide conference call last week.
“Supporters argue that it is a rainy day fund but we believe it is not a real rainy day fund because it has loopholes in it,â€Â Sunshine said. “The truth is, it is already raining on us.â€Â
Proposition 1A would increase the amount of money set aside in the state̢۪s rainy day account by increasing how much money is put into it and restricting the withdrawal of these funds.
Welty acknowledged that if voters stepped back and looked at the propositions, they would probably not advocate these steps in order to balance a budget.
“But I think it is a step forward to begin moving the state toward some budget stability rather than this dramatic [process] that we go through,â€Â he said.
When there is a recession, there is typically a sharp drop in revenues. And when things are going well, there is typically an increase.
The League of Women voters argues that Prop. 1A was hastily drafted behind closed doors, in secret budget negotiations, and passed on to voters in the dead of night without a single public hearing or any independent analysis of how it would actually work.
The League of Women voters recommends a No vote on propositions 1A, 1C, 1D and 1E.
Welty argues that the endorsement of these propositions would help the schools.
“It would allow us to go forward with the plan we have in place to offer courses for students that are here,â€Â he said.
Courses would not be added back in, he said, but it would prevent further cuts.
Marty Hittelman with the California Federation of Teachers, a group that represents K-12 teachers, is concerned that Prop. 1A puts an artificial cap on spending and would actually mean more cuts for students.
“The cap is based on what we are currently spending and then we add onto it the consumer price index and the population growth,â€Â Hittelman said. “But that doesn’t account for the student growth; it will cut the number of students that are able to attend the schools.â€Â
It is important to understand that these propositions are constitutional amendments.
Sunshine calls Prop. 1A a “complicated measure that is going to be placed into the text of the state constitution.â€Â
Whether voters want to endorse the propositions or not, Welty stressed the importance of students getting out to vote.
“If these initiatives fail it could have disastrous consequences for students,â€Â Welty said.
“I think it is in their best interest to learn something about the initiatives and to vote.â€Â
Jon • Nov 1, 2009 at 11:20 am
I think there is becoming way too many propositions, and people need to actually read and understand what these propositions are intended for. I hope people don’t vote in the future based off of someone else’s opinion and actually read in depth what it is before they vote.
Jon • Nov 1, 2009 at 6:20 pm
I think there is becoming way too many propositions, and people need to actually read and understand what these propositions are intended for. I hope people don’t vote in the future based off of someone else’s opinion and actually read in depth what it is before they vote.
No More • May 14, 2009 at 7:46 am
So many propositions we have passed in the passed please vote no don’t be fooled or blatantly vote yes realize that this is deceitful
No More • May 14, 2009 at 2:46 pm
So many propositions we have passed in the passed please vote no don’t be fooled or blatantly vote yes realize that this is deceitful
Yikes123 • May 13, 2009 at 8:21 pm
Here̢۪s a one shot summary of everything that is 100% verifiably TRUE about First 5 and Prop 1D (from IRS docs, state audited financials and the First 5 databases)
For starters:
First 5 has $2 BILLION+ ONLY because it took 2 years+ for most of them to do their strategic plan AND they were not allowed to spend the funds coming in until they did.
It was NOT due to good planning! They were forced to save it and spend it slowly per their strategic plans. There is NO budget impact because they will use what they have in the bank to fund the 5 years of temporary sharing that they are being asked to do.
So, who can a person believe at FIRST 5 ?
1. Not First 5 commissioners, since IMO they “self dealâ€Â. For a clear example, check out Riverside First 5, whose Commissioners raked in 75%+ of all program funds in FY 07/08 – at least one resigned – and they had to restructure! See http://www.pe.com for more info. Julia Glick was the reporter. Check out your local First 5 to see just how true this is!
2. Not the First 5 lobbyist, Sherry Novick. She received over $1 MILLION of First 5 funds – $200K of which went into her pension account – IRS Form 990s say so! If Prop 1D passes, it cuts her off from receiving any new funds.
ALSO – audited financials show that First 5 does NOT spend responsibly:
1. First 5 spent over $100 MILLION on private evaluation consultants!
They are on track to spend $500 MILLION on evaluation within 15 years
And $1 BILLION+ within 25 years! Where̢۪s the beef? Where̢۪s the results? Nada!
Even WORSE:
First 5 spent $500 MILLION+ on ADULTS in a program called CARES.
They gave Master’s degree holders up to $5,000 just to stay in their jobs!
Not a documented penny went to children 0 to 5! This money went up in smoke?!
Google “lakin ventura Star deception 1dâ€Â OR “melissa prop 1d baby killer smokersâ€Â for links to data and more in depth discussion.
Yikes123 • May 14, 2009 at 3:21 am
Here’s a one shot summary of everything that is 100% verifiably TRUE about First 5 and Prop 1D (from IRS docs, state audited financials and the First 5 databases)
For starters:
First 5 has $2 BILLION+ ONLY because it took 2 years+ for most of them to do their strategic plan AND they were not allowed to spend the funds coming in until they did.
It was NOT due to good planning! They were forced to save it and spend it slowly per their strategic plans. There is NO budget impact because they will use what they have in the bank to fund the 5 years of temporary sharing that they are being asked to do.
So, who can a person believe at FIRST 5 ?
1. Not First 5 commissioners, since IMO they “self deal”. For a clear example, check out Riverside First 5, whose Commissioners raked in 75%+ of all program funds in FY 07/08 ”“ at least one resigned ”“ and they had to restructure! See http://www.pe.com for more info. Julia Glick was the reporter. Check out your local First 5 to see just how true this is!
2. Not the First 5 lobbyist, Sherry Novick. She received over $1 MILLION of First 5 funds – $200K of which went into her pension account – IRS Form 990s say so! If Prop 1D passes, it cuts her off from receiving any new funds.
ALSO ”“ audited financials show that First 5 does NOT spend responsibly:
1. First 5 spent over $100 MILLION on private evaluation consultants!
They are on track to spend $500 MILLION on evaluation within 15 years
And $1 BILLION+ within 25 years! Where’s the beef? Where’s the results? Nada!
Even WORSE:
First 5 spent $500 MILLION+ on ADULTS in a program called CARES.
They gave Master’s degree holders up to $5,000 just to stay in their jobs!
Not a documented penny went to children 0 to 5! This money went up in smoke?!
Google “lakin ventura Star deception 1d” OR “melissa prop 1d baby killer smokers” for links to data and more in depth discussion.