Fresno State's student-run newspaper

The Collegian

ADVERTISEMENT
Fresno State's student-run newspaper

The Collegian

Fresno State's student-run newspaper

The Collegian

Shooters may need to take a step back for 3s

College basketball players might want to start polishing up their long-range shooting.

The men’s basketball rules committee approved a measure Thursday that would move the 3-point line back one foot in 2008-09 — from 19 feet, 9 inches to 20 feet, 9 inches. If approved by the playing rules oversight committee on May 25, it would mark the first major alteration to the 3-point shot since its inception in 1986-87.
Chairman Larry Keating said the committee considered two proposals. The other would have moved the line to 20 feet, 6 inches, the same distance as international 3-pointers. Both are shorter than the NBA line, which is 23 feet, 9 inches at the top of the key and 22 feet at its shortest point in the baseline corners.

“We made it a point to come up with a distance that was correct for us and that didn’t necessarily mimic the international line,� Keating said.

Women̢۪s rules committee chairwoman Ronda Seagraves said the 3-point line will remain unchanged in women̢۪s basketball, and Bruce Howard, spokesman for the National Federation of State High School Associations, said he̢۪s unaware of any discussion about moving it on the prep level. High schools also use the 19-foot, 9-inch distance.

The new men̢۪s rule would be adopted by all three college divisions, and Keating expects the measure to pass in three weeks.

“It (the committee) has passed what we’ve done for the most part unless there are financial or safety issues, so, yes, I think it will be approved,� he said.

The reason for delaying the change until November 2008 is money.

Keating said it was unfair to charge schools a surprise expenditure when most of the budgets for next year have already been approved. Still, Keating has been anticipating change for two decades.

“I like to say the day that it passed was the day we began discussing moving it back,� Keating said. “The basic percentages haven’t changed. I think it’s safe to say you might see some reversal on that (percentages) for men.�

NCAA statistics show that 3-point percentages since 1992 have hovered between 34.1 and 35.6 percent each year. Stats from the experimental line showed shooting percentages between 34 and 35 percent.

Keating said the primary reason for making a change was to create more space between perimeter and post players. Ideally, that would help the rules committee continue on its mission to spread the floor and reduce physical play.

View Comments (2)
Donate to The Collegian
$100
$500
Contributed
Our Goal

Your donation will support the student journalists of Fresno State Your contribution will allow us to purchase equipment and cover our annual website hosting costs.

Donate to The Collegian
$100
$500
Contributed
Our Goal

Comments (2)

All The Collegian Picks Reader Picks Sort: Newest

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  • F

    FSDogs1May 4, 2007 at 10:30 am

    This is a dumb rule change. I, for one, hope it doesn’t happen. Rules committees need to stop trying to change rules in America’s most popular sports all the time. Don’t fix what’s not broken. College b-ball is fun. It’s much better than the NBA. Don’t try to make it more like the NBA.

    Remember last year when they passed new clock rules for college football and Pat Hill said it would never last? Well whadaya know!? The rule is already gone, because it was a BAD idea. This is too.

    Reply
  • F

    FSDogs1May 4, 2007 at 5:30 pm

    This is a dumb rule change. I, for one, hope it doesn’t happen. Rules committees need to stop trying to change rules in America’s most popular sports all the time. Don’t fix what’s not broken. College b-ball is fun. It’s much better than the NBA. Don’t try to make it more like the NBA.

    Remember last year when they passed new clock rules for college football and Pat Hill said it would never last? Well whadaya know!? The rule is already gone, because it was a BAD idea. This is too.

    Reply