Innocence lost in today's 'porn'-filled society
By SHERYL VAN DER LEUN of The Washington Post
So there I was, perusing the Perfex salt grinders at my local Williams-Sonoma
store, when I overheard an excited thirty-something shopper exclaim breathlessly
as she walked by the $1,999 Jura-Capresso Impressa S8 Super Automatic
Espresso Coffeemaker, “Oh, this is pure kitchen-porn. Get me out
of here.’’
I understand the impulse. I wish I could find an escape, too. But suddenly,
porn is everywhere.
No, not the kind that shows up uninvited in your e-mail. I’m talking
about the rampant metaphornication of the word itself.
All around us, innocent phrases are being corrupted by wanton use of the
porn suffix. Hitherto untainted language is being flagrantly violated,
willfully transformed into lusty euphemisms, lending these words an attribution
they neither requested nor deserve.
It seems some of us cannot express ourselves—or at least our passions—without
resorting to porn.
You think I’m exaggerating?
Not even poor Martha Stewart is safe. The day after she checked herself
into prison, CNN People aired a biography that characterized her magazine,
Martha Stewart Living, as “homemaker porn. Essentially, it’s
aspiring to a lifestyle that you can’t have. ... It’s a fantasy
world.’’
Or how about this one? “Porn for fly-fishers,’’ quips
the table of contents in the July 2004 issue of Men’s Journal, the
magazine that carries the slogan “Live the Interesting Life’’
under its nameplate.
If that doesn’t hook male readers, what will?
Well, more of the same, apparently. The article in question (a review
of a book on—no kidding—fly-fishing) goes on to describe “Fifty
Places to Fly Fish Before You Die’’ as “bare-naked fishing
porn.’’
But then, the reviewer was only following the book’s lead. As the
foreword notes: “For fly-fishermen this collection of 50 renowned
honey-holes is, to say the least, arousing.’’
You’d think a technology Web site might resist temptation, but you’d
be wrong.
Digital Living Today described a British gadget magazine as “pure
techno-porn.’’
The deeper I looked into it, the more shocking were the transgressions.
The Web site Robot Porn bills itself as “the Internet’s premiere
site for HOT and SHINY pics of all your favorite well-oiled robots, droids,
and cyborgs of yesteryear.’’
Perhaps it’s no surprise that the most blatant examples come from
the world of food. No, I’m not talking about Jamie “The Naked
Chef’’ Oliver or Nigella “Nigella Bites’’
Lawson, but www.foodporn.com, which carries this disclaimer: “All
your delicious dreams, delightful desires, and forbidden fantasies will
be filled here at FoodPorn.com.
This page contains food-oriented graphics. If you are under legal eating
age, are offended by food, or if it is illegal to view or consume food
in your community, please leave now.’’
The site offers a wealth of tantalizing categories so foodies of every
perversion can satisfy their own desires: Amateur, Asian, Barely Legal,
Celebrities, Hardcore, Lebanese, Movies, Photos, Self-pleasuring, Table
Dance, and, of course, Toys.
It’s a quick click from edible obsessions to prime-time pandering.
PBS, CBS, Fox and other outlets have all used the same lame pun to promote
news segments on the mainstreaming of pornography in America: “Porn
in the USA.’’
Not even the Boss and his signature song are exempt from this trend.
Now that’s obscene.
But the utter depravation of it hit home the other day when my husband
brought in the mail.
“Honey, your reader-porn is here,’’ he said, handing
me the latest Levenger’s catalogue, which offers “Tools for
the Serious Reader.’’
Sigh.
Can’t we just really, really like something without turning it into
a carnal obsession?
Can’t we keep porn—and I mean porn-porn, not gadget-porn or
vegan-porn (yes, there is such a site)—where it belongs, behind
the green door and away from the innocent objects and activities of everyday
life?
How do we get back to pornsanity?
It’s simple.
If you’re tempted by the easy metaphor, take a cold shower, go back
to the keyboard and try to come up with something fresh. If that doesn’t
work, try abstinence.
It’s the only decent thing to do.
|