The Collegian

10/1/04 • Vol. 129, No. 17

Home  News  Sports  Features  Opinion  Gallery  Advertise  Archive  About Us

 Opinion
George W. Bush vs. John F. Kerry

George W. Bush vs. John F. Kerry

POST-DEBATE ANALYSIS By Ryan Smith & Nathan Hathaway

GEORGE W. BUSH

Appearance
The president came off as being slightly cocky, exuding confidence in exhibiting his usual “Texas swagger.” Bush appeared flustered and impatient at times with Kerry’s answers, often shaking his head and furrowing his brow. But while answering questions, he appeared very casual, often times leaning against the lectern and speaking conversationally to moderator Jim Lehrer, the crowd and the camera.


Homeland Security
“I wake up every day thinking about how best to protect America,” Bush fired back at Kerry at one point. “That’s my job.” He tied homeland security to the war on terror by contending that “the best way to protect this homeland is to stay on the offense.” Bush reminded Kerry his administration had “tripled the amount of money we’re spending on homeland security.” He followed the statement by reminding Kerry that it was he who created the Department of Homeland Security. He also brought up border and port control and the Patriot Act.


Foreign Policy
While he didn’t say anything that hadn’t been said in his previous speeches, he sought to reinforce his stance on terror, specifically nuclear proliferation and the issue of North Korea’s nuclear disarmament. Bush spent most of his time casting doubt on Kerry’s ability to lead the nation in a time of global unrest. Bush spent the rest of the time trying to deflect criticism about his inability to muster more international support.


Iraq
As usual, Bush went on the offensive when the debate turned to the war in Iraq. He moved quickly to point out Kerry’s inconsistencies on the war and sought to prove that his leadership was the key in defeating Saddam Hussein’s regime. When Kerry asked how two allies—Great Britain and Australia—comprised “a grand coalition,” Bush smirked and said, “Actually, he forgot Poland.” Again, Bush seemed very confident in himself during this portion of the debate. He criticized Kerry for portraying what he called the wrong message and said that “The biggest disaster that could happen is that we not succeed in Iraq.”


Overall Performance
While Bush looked restless and disdainful during Kerry’s speeches, he appeared passionate about his stance on Iraq and the need to protect the country. He questioned Kerry’s ability to lead the nation’s military while preaching a message of “wrong war, wrong place, wrong time.” He used a lot of non-verbal cues that punctuated his message. Bush’s mannerisms gave off a carefree impression, like this debate wasn’t necessary to win re-election.

 

JOHN F. KERRY

Appearance
Kerry seemed very aware that the camera might always be on him. He seemed considerably more reserved than Bush and had a more professional demeanor. While Bush moved uneasily behind the lectern during Kerry’s speeches, Kerry looked very organized both in his delivery and when Bush had the floor. The senator took notes during Bush’s remarks and looked to be preparing rebuttals. Unlike Bush, he showed little emotion throughout most of the debate.
Edge: Kerry

Homeland Security
Kerry knew that it was important to set himself apart from Bush’s homeland security policies. He openly criticized the president’s stateside policies as being detrimental to the country and said his policies would solve the problems that Bush had neglected to address. Kerry said that while Bush was more concerned with spending money on Iraq, he would take that money to support police and fire departments, upgrade security for subway systems and focus on border and port control. Kerry pointedly asked the audience if they felt safer knowing that Bush wasn’t concerned about those issues. He added “what kind of mixed message does it send when you have $500 million going over to Iraq to put police officers in the streets of Iraq, and the president is cutting the COPS program in America?”
Edge: Kerry

Foreign Policy
Kerry was quick to point out that Bush went to war with Iraq based on weapons of mass destruction, yet the United States hadn’t found any. Kerry drove the point home that he felt nuclear proliferation was the single most important issue facing the United States. While the Bush administration was hung up on Iraq, other countries, Kerry said, like Iran, Syria and North Korea posed much more serious threats. Turning the “flip-flop” issue back on Bush, he questioned the administrations experimentation with nuclear bunker-busting bombs. “You talk about mixed messages. We’re telling other people, ‘You can’t have nuclear weapons,’ but we’re pursuing a new nuclear weapon that we might even contemplate using,” Kerry said toward the end of the debate.
Edge: Kerry

Iraq
Kerry spent most of the debate over Iraq trying to discredit Bush as a global leader against terrorism. He questioned why Bush’s administration abandoned the search for Osama bin Laden and instead pursued Saddam Hussein after Sept. 11 though he had no connection to the attacks. Kerry even used Bush’s father against him in his argument against the war in Iraq, saying that, in the first Gulf War, George H.W. Bush didn’t go any farther into the country than Basra because he knew there was no exit strategy. Kerry said it was essential for the United States to regain its credibility, establish a stronger international coalition and re-enact diplomatic avenues in Iraq.
Edge: Bush

Overall Performance
Kerry started the debate rather subdued. It was imperative for Kerry to be aggressive and direct with Bush. Not until about halfway through the debate did Kerry really start to pressure Bush’s policies. He also looked to support his leadership skills, often times referring to his war record. Overall, the debate provided Kerry with the forum to clarify his policies and re-establish his leadership abilities. This combination was exactly what Kerry needed to help close the gap in the polls.
Edge: Kerry