Late last Friday night, the government narrowly averted a shutdown by agreeing to more than $38.5 billion in cuts.
It was hailed by the media as a victory for President Barack Obama and Speaker of the House John Boehner, the government officials who put compromise and the good of the country over petty partisan squabbles.
Contra the media, this budget compromise was nothing to hail; in fact, it didn’t really accomplish all that much.
Aside from the fact that the government cut spending by less than 3 percent of the annual deficit ”” not the debt, which has climbed to more than $14 trillion, but the $1.6 trillion deficit ”” what the government did cut turned out to be even less than advertised.
According to the Associated Press, $10 billion of the $38.5 billion was already going to be cut, $10 billion from accounts reserved for earmarks, which Republicans already banned, $2.5 billion from highway programs that can’t legally be spent and $5 billion from an obscure bookkeeping rule.
The vast majority of this supposed example of high statesmanship is actually an example of our elected representatives once again pulling the wool over our eyes.
The budget deal will not halt our country’s march over a fiscal cliff ”” it won’t even slow us down.
Any serious conversation about the nation’s debt/deficit crisis has to include more than non-defense discretionary spending ”” it has to include defense cuts, tax reform and Medicare and Social Security reform.
The way the government works must be reformed.
Which leads us to Rep. Paul Ryan (R-Wisc.).
Last week he unveiled his budget proposal, and it erases the long-term deficit, albeit many years down the road.
He repeals Obamacare; he cuts tax rates but closes tax loopholes; and, in his most dramatic proposal, he reforms Medicare by instead giving subsidies to seniors, who can then purchase private health insurance.
This proposal likely will not pass the Congress. But it gets the conversation started.
Building off of Rep. Ryan’s plan, any budget plan should be four-fold. Social Security can be saved by raising the age; the government can raise revenue by closing loopholes and lowering rates, though not as low as in the Ryan budget; defense spending should be cut by bringing home all troops not in combat; Medicare should be reformed in the way Ryan stipulates.
This is a budget compromise that would actually be an accomplishment.
Anonymous • Apr 13, 2011 at 6:04 pm
Ryan’s budget plan simply puts the burden on the poor and elderly instead of fixing the problem on the backs of those who caused it in the first place. Instead of changing medicare to put the cost from the government to seniors, how about fixing the tax system so that corporations pay the actual tax rate instead of the current effective tax rate of 7%. Instead of slashing medicaid how about cutting the defense budget that has inflated 81% in the last decade. Instead of lowering taxes and fixing a few loopholes that will open back up in a couple years, how about ending the tax cuts from the Bush administration and continued into the Obama administration. If you want an actual budget plan, check out the plan given by the progressive caucus in the House, which unsurprisingly receives zero press by the mainstream media.
Anonymous • Apr 13, 2011 at 5:19 pm
Dealing with deficits and debts this large is never as representatives make them about to be. Although the ideological crutch for R is cutting spending, and for D it is raising taxes on the top one or two percent, government has played the role as an artificial propping up of the private sector. The economy has become dependent on government spending. The rich probably benefit more than the poor from government subsidies. Cuts proposed by Ryan do not acknowledge the hazardous effects of his conservative-utopian vision and is not practical, and it would cripple the economy, while also punishing those who should not be affected: the poor and the elderly. And when voices that offer many instances to lower the debt that does not include raising taxes on the uber-wealthy, and would rather have Americans work until they’re 90 to retire or receive their SS should be called out.