To view Mike Boylan’s response to this article click here.

In November, Californians will have the grand opportunity to reduce crime and prison costs, create jobs and reduce police corruption. This can be done by voting in favor of AB 2254, the proposition to “decriminalize” marijuana in the state of California.

This is a perfect time for the our state to enter the drug dealing business. If you’re in dire straits, what else can you do?

In spite of having some of the highest tax rates in the nation, California spends money like Lindsay Lohan, while state employees across the board are facing layoffs and furlough days. Apparently, this doesn’t matter to the suits in Sacramento. Instead, they seem to think that this is the perfect time to grow government.

If the state can barely afford the employees it already has, why not hire more? Sounds like a good idea, right? Growers, cultivators, record keepers and vendors of California bud will all be hired to ensure proper taxation and distribution. This is how www.yes390.org made the claim that the bill would create jobs.

How about an oxymoronic (leaning more toward moronic) claim stated in the bill itself? One of the passages states that besides establishing the “wholesale and retail sales regulation program,” taxation within the proposal includes, “special fees to fund drug abuse prevention programs.”

So, California is going to sell pot and use a small amount of the proceeds to fund drug abuse prevention programs. Why would you shoot yourself in the foot? If you want to maximize sales of a product, you don’t spend money to subsidize programs that tell people not to use it. It sounds like Toyota setting up lectures around the country, with experts telling attendees how not to buy a Toyota. It doesn’t make any sense, but I’m not surprised.

An article written by Daniela Perdomo, featured on alternet.com, a website that has such random phrases scattered about like, “we want a president who won’t coddle capitalism,” said that the proposal “institutes a one-ounce personal possession limit and allows for limited personal cultivation.”

I thought the state was responsible for cultivating it. My entrepreneurial spirit would tell me, should I want to join in on the fun, to grow a multitude of pot and sell it, discretely, on my own. Odds are that buyers would want to buy from a private dealer anyway, just to avoid the more than likely ballooned prices and state taxes. Moonshine is still produced in Appalachia, so what does that tell you?

It’s also interesting that California set the age limit for marijuana use/cultivation/possession at 21. Just like alcohol, what are the odds that young adults under 21 won’t ever gain access to marijuana? Gee, that will never happen.

Marijuana use in California is seemingly accepted. There are many “smoke shops” spread around town, selling bongs and pipes typically not used for smoking tobacco. Last Tuesday was April 20, the unrecognized recognized marijuana user’s day.

What’s wrong with the way things are? If you’re caught with a small amount on you, the fines aren’t steep. There are places to buy pipes and paper, and even a special day recognizing the fact that marijuana use is far out, man. You get a little rush, being defiant as you purchase your package, and once you’re home, life is good.

If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it. If you’re a user, why would you want the government regulating another aspect of your life? Don’t be fooled. It’s just another way to take more of your money and blaze it up.