Read Mike’s response to this article here.
I am a Christian conservative. I am a Christian because I believe Jesus Christ died on a cross and rose from the dead on the third day, saving me from eternal damnation from my sins. I celebrated this very act on Easter Sunday, the greatest day in all of history.
I am a conservative because I believe with Russell Kirk, that 20th-century man of letters who gave the movement its name with his magnum opus “The Conservative Mind,” when he said that the “essence of social conservatism is preservation of the ancient moral traditions of humanity.” I believe with Abraham Lincoln, who once gave this rhetorical inquiry: “What is conservatism? Is it not adherence to the old and tried, against the new and untried?”
In the name Christian conservative, there is no contradiction. It is no oxymoron. For the tradition I aim to uphold is one that is Christian in character.
America is a fundamentally Christian nation. Tocqueville, writing on the American character in the 1830s, wrote, “The sects that exist in the United States are innumerable. They all differ in respect to the worship which is due to the Creator; but they all agree in respect to the duties which are due from man to man. Each sect adores the Deity in its own peculiar manner, but all sects preach the same moral law in the name of God.”
Says the great French thinker, even our government took heed from our belief. “Religion in America takes no direct part in the government of society,” continues Tocqueville, “but it must be regarded as the first of their political institutions.”
So preserving tradition in America means preserving a Christian way of living, which is exactly what conservatism aspires to do.
But what of specific policy prescriptions? Do positions usually ascribed to conservatives match up with the teachings of Jesus?
My colleague argues that a belief that free-markets provide for a better economic system is at odds with Jesus’ teachings, that a true Christian would be a socialist. This is not so. Jesus’ instructions are for individuals, not for governments. Of course it is a good thing for Christians to give to the poor and various charitable institutions””I don’t know of any Christian conservative who is against that. Jesus’ teachings involving government, though, are pretty much limited to “give to Caesar what belongs to Caesar.”
But what of something like marriage, or, more specifically, gay marriage? The conservative believes in traditional marriage precisely for that reason, because it comes from our tradition. The Christian believes in traditional marriage because that’s what the Bible teaches. The Christian believes that all Scripture is God-breathed, so they take Leviticus 18:22 or Romans 1:26-27 at face value.
It would be tedious and uninteresting to take each political issue point by point and show how the conservative position and the Christian position coincide. Besides, not all conservatives agree on every issue. Conservatism is unique in that it is, at its core, not an ideology.
There is no “Conservative Manifesto” which lists views to combat its communist counterpart. Conservatives cannot be rigidly defined. There are anti-war conservatives and pro-war conservatives. There are conservatives that believe in free trade and those that are protectionist. There are neocons, paleocons, crunchy cons, Burkeans, libertarians, classical liberals, the list goes on and on. All coalesce under the big tent of “conservatism.” All are often at odds with one another. But all believe in preserving our moral traditions, of which Christianity is one.
Calling oneself a Christian conservative requires no suspension of rational thought. Saying it does is itself irrational.
Dan • Apr 9, 2010 at 3:04 pm
Organized religion, Christianity especially, has all the trappings of a cult. And, cults are a danger to others. The writer is free to believe whatever he wishes, as long as he does not endanger anyone else. If his beliefs end up presenting an immediate threat to my life and well-being, I will defend myself by any means necessary….
Dan • Apr 9, 2010 at 3:04 pm
Organized religion, Christianity especially, has all the trappings of a cult. And, cults are a danger to others. The writer is free to believe whatever he wishes, as long as he does not endanger anyone else. If his beliefs end up presenting an immediate threat to my life and well-being, I will defend myself by any means necessary….
Dan • Apr 9, 2010 at 7:04 am
Organized religion, Christianity especially, has all the trappings of a cult. And, cults are a danger to others. The writer is free to believe whatever he wishes, as long as he does not endanger anyone else. If his beliefs end up presenting an immediate threat to my life and well-being, I will defend myself by any means necessary….
joshua4234 • Apr 7, 2010 at 2:42 pm
“The Christian believes that all Scripture is God-breathed”
Well, from my days as a Christian I recall a story about a rich man asking Jesus how he could get to heaven, and Jesus replied by telling him to give his riches to the poor and follow him because it was easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to enter the kingdom of God. Jesus didn't say 'well give a few small portions of your riches to charities while keeping the majority for your lavish lifestyle.' It takes quite a bit of dishonesty to make jumps of this kind. Let's cut the crap Tony, the truth is it's inconvenient to live like that, but it's easy to hate homosexuality and gay marriage.
Karl Marx • Apr 7, 2010 at 7:20 am
Tony tony. Regarding Jesus not being a “socialist” because his teachings were for individuals, not governments, who makes up governments? Individuals do. And more specifically, communism (as well as other leftist thought) is the eventual abolition of government because it sees government as the protector of capital, so if Jesus' teachings were indeed for individuals, he would likely be a leftist (communist, anarchist, etc) and favor the collective good. Another thing, the Communist Manifesto is most certainly not the ideological text of Marxists. The Manifesto was a call to the proletariat all over the globe to unite in revolution to capitalism. It was party propaganda. Marxist ideology is laid-out in many other texts (most notably, Capital), but not the Manifesto…. and thirdly, please quit furthering the myth that a “libertarian” is some ideology way out on the right. Look into the history of the term “Libertarian”. It originated as the anti-statist (anarchist) wing of the socialist movement with the pro-state wing being Marx and his following. In history it was standard to follow the term “Libertarian” with “Socialist”. The term was “Libertarian-Socialist” (whose philosophy was anarchist)…. Unfortunately today, the right has perverted it.