Sometimes it might be better to keep superstar’s private lives private
Tiger Woods is, arguably (although, arguably, you can argue anything, so this is just a throwaway phrase ”” but I digress), the most popular athlete on the planet. He makes an ungodly amount of money. He’s the best golfer of his time. And yet, we’ve never known anything about his personal life.
That is, until last week.
At about 2 a.m. Friday, Woods crashed his SUV into a fire hydrant and tree in his neighbors yard and suffered minor injuries. If one believes the Internet (and when has the Internet ever given us reason to doubt it? Wait, don’t answer that question) then Tiger and his wife, Elin, got in an argument about Tiger’s relationship with another woman (as reported by the always trustworthy National Enquirer) and Tiger left the house, wanting to get away from the situation.
As he was leaving, Elin took a golf club and started banging his car with it. Tiger, distracted, then crashed the car.
Juicy stuff.
Now, everyone and their mother are counseling Tiger to “come clean” and tell the public the salacious details it wants to hear. We deserve the right to know, Tiger, after everything we’ve done for you.
This is all a bunch of hooey.
Tiger, just keep doing what you’re doing. You don’t have to tell anyone what really happened.
As a matter of fact, I don’t want to know.
Why do we need to know the flaws of our heroes? What do we gain from it?
For we all have flaws, and we all have skeletons in the closet that we do not want anyone else to know about it. As guitarist Russell Hammond (played brilliantly by Billy Crudup) says in the classic 2001 movie “Almost Famous,” “Some of us, we have girlfriends back home, you know. Some of us have wives. And some of the people you meet on the road are really amazing people…But some of the stuff that happens, it’s good for a few people to know about as opposed to, say, a million people.”
My sentiments exactly. I don’t want to know when Tiger screws up. I don’t want to know about Ben Roethlisberger’s off-season escapades. I don’t want to know what Kobe Bryant was doing at Eagle, Colo.
If The Collegian reported on my transgressions, I wouldn’t be too pleased. I wouldn’t get anything out of it. You, the reader, wouldn’t get anything out of it. It is pointless information.
Why is it any different for our sports heroes? In the old days, (jeez, I sound like my father) reporters protected athletes from this kind of stuff (and for that matter, politicians as well ”” I’m looking at you, JFK). It wasn’t the kind of thing that needed to be written about. Mickey Mantle was a legendary partier and womanizer. He famously hit home runs while still being hung over from the debauchery of the night before. And whom would it help if people knew about it at the time?
Tiger, stay silent if you want to. You owe us nothing. We don’t need to know about your personal life, just as you don’t need to know about mine. Just keep on chasing Jack Nicklaus’ record of 18 major championships.
Although, you might want to take a few swinging lessons from your wife. I hear she swings a mean 9-iron.
joshua4234 • Dec 4, 2009 at 6:00 pm
yeah, I agree with you tjrich09, but I don't think this is the place to get into the religiously motivated dislike of homosexuality that is pushed into our supposedly secular government. The motivation for treating homosexuality poorly is as non-secular as the motivation for Blue Laws, which I'm sad to say are still around in many states.
joshua4234 • Dec 4, 2009 at 5:59 pm
I agree. We definitely need to be able to remove the art from the artist, so to speak. I don't care about Tiger's personally life any more than the guy driving next to me on the freeway, and neither should anybody else. You can simply enjoy his golf skill for it's own sake, like, for example, I can think Mel Gibson is a crazy religious nutjob but appreciate his acting skills in movies such as Maverick or think that Jim Carrey is an idiot for supporting Jenny McCarthy and her anti-vaccination bullshit but still enjoy a lot of his comedy.
joshua4234 • Dec 4, 2009 at 10:00 am
yeah, I agree with you tjrich09, but I don't think this is the place to get into the religiously motivated dislike of homosexuality that is pushed into our supposedly secular government. The motivation for treating homosexuality poorly is as non-secular as the motivation for Blue Laws, which I'm sad to say are still around in many states.
joshua4234 • Dec 4, 2009 at 9:59 am
I agree. We definitely need to be able to remove the art from the artist, so to speak. I don't care about Tiger's personally life any more than the guy driving next to me on the freeway, and neither should anybody else. You can simply enjoy his golf skill for it's own sake, like, for example, I can think Mel Gibson is a crazy religious nutjob but appreciate his acting skills in movies such as Maverick or think that Jim Carrey is an idiot for supporting Jenny McCarthy and her anti-vaccination bullshit but still enjoy a lot of his comedy.
tjrich09 • Dec 3, 2009 at 10:53 am
Exactly, keep one's personal life private. This is why we should allow homosexual couples to marry. It's none of our business. And yet you, Mr. Peterson, are quite quick to attack this group. I mean, are you saying Tiger's alleged adultery isn't as bad as a homosexual relationship?
Gloria Hernandez • Dec 3, 2009 at 8:25 am
pure genius. i thoroughly enjoyed it