New U.S. president Barack Obama has not slacked off during his first few days in office. Immediately following his inauguration he got to work addressing several pressing national issues, including the economy and the war in Iraq.
I commend our new president for such motivation and ambition in these actions. Most of his decisions I have agreed with, especially his radical ideas concerning our economy- for example, his proposed $825 billion dollar stimulus package to alleviate the recession.
But one of his very first actions, troubles me (and I believe most of the nation): President Obama̢۪s order to shut down military prison Guantanamo Bay by 2010.
Guantanamo Bay at present houses nearly 245 men accused of and/or charged with international terrorist activity. Obama̢۪s administration has noted that the closure of the facility is a necessary move in order to correct mistakes made by the Bush administration and to set a new example on the international stage.
But what does that even mean?
Frankly, I feel much safer with those men locked up in Guantanamo. I am even more nervous about the situation because as of right now there is no system in place for the placing of Guantanamo detainees.
According to an article in the Kansas City Star, the new administration has mentioned placing the detainees in Kansas at Fort Leavenworth.
Yes, you read that right: the only suggested idea so far is to place international terror suspects on our very own soil. This idea doesn̢۪t bode well with me.
I tend to agree with Kansas politicians in the aforementioned Kansas City Star article in that “the military prison might not be equipped for such high-risk inmates, and that the fort and the community might be targeted by terrorists.â€Â
There is also discussion of the release of many of the detainees. Right now, there is a program through the Saudi Arabian government known as “terrorist rehabilitation,â€Â that is supposed to “reprogramâ€Â these detainees so that they can rejoin society.
But have you seen what this “rehabâ€Â actually consists of?
The program is not very comforting and the fact that one of their “graduatesâ€Â actually went right back to his respective terrorist organization and was responsible for several recent bombings really makes me question the decision to close Guantanamo.
I urge President Obama to carefully consider this move and just keep Guantanamo open, because with no appropriate plan in place, it̢۪s just too risky considering the possible consequences.
T J Richmond • Oct 17, 2009 at 10:02 pm
Too bad it still hasn’t been closed down.
T J Richmond • Oct 18, 2009 at 5:02 am
Too bad it still hasn’t been closed down.
ueuecoyot • May 18, 2009 at 10:55 pm
ARE YOU SERIOUS? The greatest usurpations and human rights violations occur in this putrid abhorrent massive torture chamber. Whether this is these people are terrorist or not (most have not been convicted!!) they deserve to be treated as humans, not under constant torture. Guantanamo resembles more a concentration camp rather than a prison!
ueuecoyot • May 19, 2009 at 5:55 am
ARE YOU SERIOUS? The greatest usurpations and human rights violations occur in this putrid abhorrent massive torture chamber. Whether this is these people are terrorist or not (most have not been convicted!!) they deserve to be treated as humans, not under constant torture. Guantanamo resembles more a concentration camp rather than a prison!
Wesley Snipes • Jan 28, 2009 at 9:20 pm
That stimulus plan is ridiculous. Most of that money won’t even be spent during the next two of three years. It’s just an expansion of an already failing government.
Wesley Snipes • Jan 29, 2009 at 4:20 am
That stimulus plan is ridiculous. Most of that money won’t even be spent during the next two of three years. It’s just an expansion of an already failing government.