Ryan Tubongbanua / The Collegian
I ADMIT IT. I̢۪M A CONSERVATIVE JOURNALIST.
I support the second amendment. I̢۪m pro-life. I support teaching creationism in schools. (Don̢۪t worry, I̢۪ve informed my editor in chief about the deluge of hate mail we̢۪ll get for my daring to support such things.)
I should be thrilled that Republican presidential nominee John McCain chose the extremely conservative Sarah Palin as his running mate. I̢۪m not.
Palin, currently in her second year as governor of Alaska, is the second-biggest mistake McCain could have made.
The first would have been to pick Connecticut senator Joe Lieberman for the position.
Rumor has it Palin was chosen to both entice Hillary Clinton̢۪s former supporters and reassure Republicans concerned about McCain̢۪s history of compromise. In other words, Palin is supposed to appeal to both the extreme left and the extreme right.
Lynda Carter, move over.
First, let̢۪s look at why Palin should appeal to Democrats. Clinton is female. Palin is also female. Therefore, Clinton̢۪s supporters should now support Palin. In addition to failing tests of basic logic, this is the most offensive assumption McCain could have made. Policies and ideologies don̢۪t matter to voters as much as the candidate̢۪s sex does.
Some women, of course, supported Clinton merely in hopes of seeing a woman in the White House. History shows that there weren̢۪t enough of them to keep Clinton afloat. Why would any politician try to copycat a losing tactic?
Then there̢۪s Palin̢۪s conservative appeal. A hunter and fisherwoman, she supports gun ownership and use while advocating drilling for oil in the Alaskan National Wildlife Refuge. She supports abortion only when the mother̢۪s life is in jeopardy. She wants creationism and abstinence-only sex ed taught in schools.
She is the right̢۪s answer to Obama in that she, like him, has very little actual experience. Dreamy-eyed as only a neophyte can be, she holds aloft the banner of party idealism, becoming, like Obama, more of a caricature than a real person.
Granted, such a deficit of experience is more forgivable in a vice presidential rather than a presidential candidate. But with less than two years as governor of Alaska under her belt, she̢۪s hardly someone to go running to if, to create an impossibly outlandish scenario, terrorists fly airplanes into the Twin Towers.
She could very well be the person handling America̢۪s delicate international situations if McCain̢۪s age gets the better of him.
Someone who got her first passport in 2007 is not ready to make decisions of that magnitude.
So she doesn̢۪t have experience with foreign affairs. At least she̢۪s had experience managing the budget for the state that had, nation-wide, the fifth-highest gross state product in 2006.
One of Palin’s selling points is her experience at exposing government’s fiscal excess. She auctioned off her predecessor’s private jet for $2.1 million on eBay. She refused federal funds for the so-called “Bridge to Nowhereâ€Â that was to connect Ketchikan, Alaska, to the airport on nearby Gravina Island.
At least, she refused to build the bridge. The Anchorage Daily News reported on August 31 that a federally funded road was still being built to the bridge̢۪s planned location because Alaska would have had to return the money allocated for the road otherwise.
There won’t be a bridge, the funds for which are being used “for other projects,â€Â the ADN reports. But there will be a road to the water’s edge.
Magnify that inanity by fifty and apply it to national issues.
In McCain’s 2002 book, “Worth the Fighting For,â€Â written with Mark Salter, McCain said of his decision-making, “Often my haste is a mistake, but I live with the consequences without complaint.â€Â
He may indeed be able to live with the consequences of his rushed decision to pick Sarah Palin over a more stable, less polarizing candidate like Mitt Romney.
America shouldn̢۪t have to.
Heather Billings • Sep 4, 2008 at 2:35 pm
The Collegian Staff Comment
Eric: It’s always nice to meet people who are open-minded. And next time, you might try reading the article before you comment on it.
Heather Billings • Sep 4, 2008 at 9:35 pm
The Collegian Staff Comment
Eric: It’s always nice to meet people who are open-minded. And next time, you might try reading the article before you comment on it.
Scout • Sep 4, 2008 at 12:38 pm
After having a few days to think it over, and seeing her speech last night at the GOP convention, I really think this may be a few nails in the McCain coffin.
Lets start with the choice in general. Palin is a woman. Heather hits it right on the nose, she was picked because she was female (not the first female VP picked by a major candidate that was in 1986 by the Dems), anyone that says otherwise is lying.
She was picked to be the historical choice pitted against Obama, first black president, or first female to occupy one of the top two positions in the white house (barring any Bill Clinton shenanigans).
By picking her the GOP wanted to try and pick up any supporters Hillary had, and sadly I must disagree with Heather, there are people in the country that will be dumb enough (if they are registered to vote) to vote for Palin simply because she is female, as they would have done if Hillary had gotten the nomination. I have heard way too many people saying this for at least a percentage of it not to be true.
As a side note I have read a few places that McCain originally wanted to pick Lieberman, but was dissuaded from it to pick Palin by the Party. This also upsets me that someone as “maverick” as McCain could be persuaded to change his mind by his party, not really leader of the free wolrd material, but history with McCain has shown that this may be isolated.
Picking Palin also has closed off any more “Obama has no experience” attacks that have been hurled the past year. Palin being a first term governor, and previous small town mayor is the greenest one in the bunch.
Also Palin was picked while, allegedly (I am not so sure this is true) McCain was aware of Palin’s daughter’s pregnancy, and while Palin is in the midst of an investigation of possible abuse of power (see: “Toopergate” (why do we lable every scandal with -gate? I understand Watergate, but that was the name of the hotel, it really isnt that catchy)). One of the major announcements at the GOP convention was that she had just hired a lawyer to defend herself. I felt that boded well for the tone of the already subdued convention (sarcasm).
The thing that really upset me was Palins speech last night. Depending on the coverage you read about it, it was anything from “a no holds barred slugfest, shot straight from the hip” or “the most disresctful display toward opponents” that you may have ever heard. For a campaign that has been complaining about the diggs Obama supporters have been making towards both the Presidential and VP nominees, Palin was over the top, in shots, insults, and a level of disrespect that just set a horrible tone for how she plans to run her campaign. In my opinion she came off as arrogant (which I can say the same for Obama even more so for Mrs. Obama), insulting, extremely stand-offish.
All in all not the person we want to step in for McCain “when his age catches up with him”. It may not even be the end of his life, it could be any ailment including his long running battle with skin cancer, that could remove him from being active, where she would need to step in. As passionate as she is I dont think that would work out for our nation.
All in my opinion of course.
Scout • Sep 4, 2008 at 7:38 pm
After having a few days to think it over, and seeing her speech last night at the GOP convention, I really think this may be a few nails in the McCain coffin.
Lets start with the choice in general. Palin is a woman. Heather hits it right on the nose, she was picked because she was female (not the first female VP picked by a major candidate that was in 1986 by the Dems), anyone that says otherwise is lying.
She was picked to be the historical choice pitted against Obama, first black president, or first female to occupy one of the top two positions in the white house (barring any Bill Clinton shenanigans).
By picking her the GOP wanted to try and pick up any supporters Hillary had, and sadly I must disagree with Heather, there are people in the country that will be dumb enough (if they are registered to vote) to vote for Palin simply because she is female, as they would have done if Hillary had gotten the nomination. I have heard way too many people saying this for at least a percentage of it not to be true.
As a side note I have read a few places that McCain originally wanted to pick Lieberman, but was dissuaded from it to pick Palin by the Party. This also upsets me that someone as “maverick” as McCain could be persuaded to change his mind by his party, not really leader of the free wolrd material, but history with McCain has shown that this may be isolated.
Picking Palin also has closed off any more “Obama has no experience” attacks that have been hurled the past year. Palin being a first term governor, and previous small town mayor is the greenest one in the bunch.
Also Palin was picked while, allegedly (I am not so sure this is true) McCain was aware of Palin’s daughter’s pregnancy, and while Palin is in the midst of an investigation of possible abuse of power (see: “Toopergate” (why do we lable every scandal with -gate? I understand Watergate, but that was the name of the hotel, it really isnt that catchy)). One of the major announcements at the GOP convention was that she had just hired a lawyer to defend herself. I felt that boded well for the tone of the already subdued convention (sarcasm).
The thing that really upset me was Palins speech last night. Depending on the coverage you read about it, it was anything from “a no holds barred slugfest, shot straight from the hip” or “the most disresctful display toward opponents” that you may have ever heard. For a campaign that has been complaining about the diggs Obama supporters have been making towards both the Presidential and VP nominees, Palin was over the top, in shots, insults, and a level of disrespect that just set a horrible tone for how she plans to run her campaign. In my opinion she came off as arrogant (which I can say the same for Obama even more so for Mrs. Obama), insulting, extremely stand-offish.
All in all not the person we want to step in for McCain “when his age catches up with him”. It may not even be the end of his life, it could be any ailment including his long running battle with skin cancer, that could remove him from being active, where she would need to step in. As passionate as she is I dont think that would work out for our nation.
All in my opinion of course.
John • Sep 4, 2008 at 9:17 am
“Hard to argue small-town mayor versus state senator.”
She’s the governor of Alaska! She has more executive experience than Obama. So what’s your point?
John • Sep 4, 2008 at 4:17 pm
“Hard to argue small-town mayor versus state senator.”
She’s the governor of Alaska! She has more executive experience than Obama. So what’s your point?
Erik • Sep 3, 2008 at 8:36 pm
I’m a democrat, and I can’t stand Obama and his overuse of the word “change.” This year I’m voting for McCain 😀
Erik • Sep 4, 2008 at 3:36 am
I’m a democrat, and I can’t stand Obama and his overuse of the word “change.” This year I’m voting for McCain 😀
Whatever • Sep 3, 2008 at 6:45 pm
haha I like this Eric guy!
It’s fine to teach creationism — in mythology class, or maybe in fiction classes in the English dept. It’s OK to have an unpopular opinion. It’s good to hear your opinions might in fact be unpopular in a place of LEARNING and enlightenment.
It’s also good to see conservatives admitting this is a strange choice, though. Doesn’t make a lot of sense really.
And while Obama may not be as experienced as someone like McCain or Biden, plenty of arguments can be made for youth being a good thing. However, Obama’s experience is much more valuable and pertinent to running the country, I’d say.
Hard to argue small-town mayor versus state senator.
And yes, like Eric said, she’s basically nuts.
Whatever • Sep 4, 2008 at 1:45 am
haha I like this Eric guy!
It’s fine to teach creationism — in mythology class, or maybe in fiction classes in the English dept. It’s OK to have an unpopular opinion. It’s good to hear your opinions might in fact be unpopular in a place of LEARNING and enlightenment.
It’s also good to see conservatives admitting this is a strange choice, though. Doesn’t make a lot of sense really.
And while Obama may not be as experienced as someone like McCain or Biden, plenty of arguments can be made for youth being a good thing. However, Obama’s experience is much more valuable and pertinent to running the country, I’d say.
Hard to argue small-town mayor versus state senator.
And yes, like Eric said, she’s basically nuts.
Eric • Sep 3, 2008 at 4:53 pm
Heather Billings, you just admitted to being a complete idiot. Supernatural deities are fake and all religions are fairy tales. Stupid religious beliefs are what drives every terrorist out there.
If you believe that myths from the middle ages should be taught as fact in schools, you should move to Iran or Saudi Arabia. Seriously.
I am suprised you do not like Palin. She is a complete idiot, you should lover her!
Eric • Sep 3, 2008 at 11:53 pm
Heather Billings, you just admitted to being a complete idiot. Supernatural deities are fake and all religions are fairy tales. Stupid religious beliefs are what drives every terrorist out there.
If you believe that myths from the middle ages should be taught as fact in schools, you should move to Iran or Saudi Arabia. Seriously.
I am suprised you do not like Palin. She is a complete idiot, you should lover her!
Eric • Sep 3, 2008 at 4:48 pm
Panlin is a member of an apocolyptic cult.
Speaking before the Pentecostal church, Sarah Palin painted the current war in Iraq as a messianic affair in which the United States could act out the will of the Lord.
Very disturbing!
Eric • Sep 3, 2008 at 11:48 pm
Panlin is a member of an apocolyptic cult.
Speaking before the Pentecostal church, Sarah Palin painted the current war in Iraq as a messianic affair in which the United States could act out the will of the Lord.
Very disturbing!
Diane W. • Sep 3, 2008 at 11:36 am
McCain has made a real blunder
that has made the whole country wonder,
was Palin the best pick
this chick from the sticks
to lead us when he’s six feet under?
Diane W. • Sep 3, 2008 at 6:36 pm
McCain has made a real blunder
that has made the whole country wonder,
was Palin the best pick
this chick from the sticks
to lead us when he’s six feet under?