“WHERE DID WE GO WRONG?â€Â
I often hear my mother ask no one in particular. She is only half-joking.
If this were an actual joke, however, it might go something like this: What do you get when you cross two meat-loving Catholic conservatives?
A liberal vegetarian who writes smut.
Of course, I̢۪ve been defying her expectations since the day I was born. My mom just knew she was going to have a boy.
“Mrs. Peterson, it’s a girl!â€Â
“A GIRL?â€Â
She always hoped I̢۪d grow up to be a mystery-lover, but I gravitated to trashy romances instead. It was just one of many preferences that divided our tastes.
But the day I started penning erotic fiction, that was the last straw.
“Well, there’s only one thing left to do. I’m going to pray that you become a nun.â€Â Again, only half-joking.
It wasn̢۪t until the day my first piece was accepted, though, that I realized my parents̢۪ disapproval did not matter, at least to the extent that it was not going to keep me from writing what I chose.
Why should smut be society̢۪s dirty little secret, or mine, for that matter?
Sex is so frequently cheapened by the media and hushed up in the churches, the widespread belief is that smut can̢۪t be art. Its only purpose is to get you off, right?
Think again.
Once the subject is allowed to breathe on the page in the absence of society̢۪s narrow mold, the emotions and the motives unfold into stories, often revealing us in our most fragile or empowering moments, but always at our most human.
And sure, smut has long been considered the realm of the male, but erotica has given women̢۪s sexuality a voice, providing them a vehicle with which to express feelings and desires that, in the past, have sometimes gone unspoken, unheard.
The possibilities are endless as the positions, as new genres — erotic sci-fi, horror and suspense, to name just a few — flourish in an ever-expanding literary landscape. Likewise, there are preferences enough to suit every taste imaginable.
So look again. Behind even the most basic written encounter lies an invisible thread of narrative, scenes crafted out of words, woven together into a story, however seemingly simple.
And ironically, the first erotic content I ever laid eyes on came from the Bible:
My beloved thrust his hand into the opening,
and my inmost being yearned for him.
I arose to open to my beloved,
and my hand dripped with myrrh,
my fingers with liquid myrrh,
upon the handles of the bolt.
(Song of Solomon 5:4-5).
If that̢۪s not art, then I don̢۪t know what is. And I suspect God would agree.
Charles W. Frank • Feb 20, 2008 at 8:41 pm
Kudos … excellent point of view for old-schoolers to contemplate. Anybody interested in doing a piece on foul language being a part of any language … a form of expression that shouldn’t be censored?
Charles W. Frank • Feb 21, 2008 at 3:41 am
Kudos … excellent point of view for old-schoolers to contemplate. Anybody interested in doing a piece on foul language being a part of any language … a form of expression that shouldn’t be censored?
Valerie Nevens • Feb 11, 2008 at 9:43 am
The Collegian Staff Comment
Wow, Sarah, I never thought of it like that. Song of Solomon is my favorite book of the Bible. It is romantic.
But, of course, keep in mind the Bible’s version of “erotica” is of course between a married couple. I’m not so sure about the modern day stuff…
Good job ,though, making your point.
Valerie Nevens • Feb 11, 2008 at 4:43 pm
The Collegian Staff Comment
Wow, Sarah, I never thought of it like that. Song of Solomon is my favorite book of the Bible. It is romantic.
But, of course, keep in mind the Bible’s version of “erotica” is of course between a married couple. I’m not so sure about the modern day stuff…
Good job ,though, making your point.