Cover bands face the near-impossible challenge of doing justice to the originals while still carving out their own niche in pop music history.
Director Julie Taymor’s film “Across the Universe” — conceptually “Moulin Rouge” and musically The Beatles — seems primed for success on both counts, if only because The Beatles are still popular.
After all, it was almost 40 years ago today The Beatles were taught to play, and the Fab Four are still going strong.
It’s no surprise that “Across the Universe’s” soundtrack is a slew of fun, beautifully lyrical songs, but a shame that it too often channels its novelty from the mid-60s.
Taymor, who does double duty as the soundtrack’s executive producer, drew from both a more famous solo act — U2’s Bono — and relative unknown musical talents — Jim Sturgess and Evan Rachel Wood, who also play the male and female lead in the movie.
For their part, Sturgess and Wood do their best when the often-bulky accompaniments don’t crowd their broad vocal performances.
For example, Sturgess’ “All My Loving” is marvelous right up until the rest of the band comes in, and his “Something” is to date the best cover of a George Harrison song I’ve ever heard.
And while Wood’s “It Won’t Be Long” fails to escape the original’s boy-band skiffle, it’s nonetheless a solid recording. If she needed any redeeming, she’d have it fully with a clear and chirp-less “Blackbird.”
Both Sturgess and Wood are easier on the ears than any of The Beatles ever were.
On the other hand, Bono is fresh like week-old salmon. In true Bono fashion, any innovations in both of his covers — namely “I Am the Walrus” and “Lucy in the Sky with Diamonds” — make the songs unremarkable and bland.
What’s worse is that his versions aren’t even successful as paint-by-the-numbers remixes of the original songs. These lackluster contributions strip out any roughness or flavor from the 1967 releases. Because of that, the improved post-production effects his versions do feature make the songs less psychedelic, not more.
Bono avoids producing the soundtrack’s biggest flub, though. That honor goes to T.V. Carpio for her “I Want to Hold Your Hand.” This take loses its momentum from the way she warbles her way through it. Her often-shrill voice lands squarely between whine and scream.
Mediocrity aside, there are certainly a few stand-out songs on the CD.
By-and-far the best among any of the 16 songs is “Let It Be.” Soulful and crisp, this gospel take avoids going over the top. Like much of Taymor’s soundtrack, it’s also a far superior recording to the original.
Original mixer Phil Spector’s “Wall of Sound” is nowhere to be heard and the backup vocals aren’t outright cheesy. It’s the best pop use of a gospel choir since the Red Hot Chili Peppers recorded “Under the Bridge.”
“Come Together” and “Helter Skelter” also compare favorably to The Beatles’ releases. In each, it’s almost like a distortion-heavy Jimi Hendrix did a take or two while holding back on his usual sort of distortion-pedal musical chaos. The results are a few more great recordings that sound just enough like and just enough unlike the original ones.
With exceptions like these, it’s a pity that the “Across the Universe” soundtrack is evenly divided with inspired covers and those that rest heavily on their lyrical laurels.
It’s hard not to feel almost sorry for Taymor. If anyone’s going to listen to her story, it’s because they’ve been hearing it for 40 years.
Beatles vs. Cover Songs
1) Song: “All My Loving”
Which version is better?
Verdict:
Original
Reason: Taymor opened with a capella vocals — that’s gutsy. Does it pay off? No.
2) Song: “I Want to Hold Your Hand”
Which version is better?
Verdict:
Original
Reason: The only thing striking about Taymor’s version is the excessive vibrato.
3) Song: “It Won’t Be Long”
Which version is better?
Verdict:
Taymor
Reason: Essentially the same, but I happen to like girl bands better than boy bands.
4) Song: “I’ve Just Seen a Face”
Which version is better?
Verdict:
Original
Reason: Taymor’s — heavier and glossier — doesn’t go two rounds with the breezy original.
5) Song: “Let It Be”
Which version is better?
Verdict:
Taymor
Reason: Add just a pinch of “Lean On Me,” switch out the cheesy organ.
6) Song: “Come Together”
Which version is better?
Verdict:
Taymor
Reason: A Hendrix-esque character does this one in the film. Almost sounds like it.
7) Song: “I Am the Walrus”
Which version is better?
Verdict:
Original
Reason: Improved post-production effects do not a better song make.
8) Song: “Something”
Which version is better?
Verdict:
Taymor
Reason: Once everything else is mixed softly enough, Sturgess outshines the old vocals.
9) Song: “Oh! Darling”
Which version is better?
Verdict:
Original
Reason: The distortion pedal doesn’t serve this one as well as it did on “Come Together.”
10) Song: “Strawberry Fields Forever”
Which version is better?
Verdict:
Taymor
Reason: Taymor’s version cut out the horns, and the ending loses the bad parts of the original.
11) Song: “Across the Universe”
Which version is better?
Verdict:
Original
Reason: The old one doesn’t sounds ridiculous reciting the mantra.
12) Song: “Helter Skelter”
Which version is better?
Verdict:
Taymor
Reason: The new version has hard rock guitarists playing it, and it ends the first time.
13) Song: “Happiness Is a Warm Gun”
Which version is better?
Verdict:
Original
Reason: Close, but hats off to the original’s electric guitar’s edginess.
14) Song: “Blackbird”
Which version is better?
Verdict:
Taymor
Reason: A striking new ending. As one editor put it, it’s without those stupid bird sounds.
15) Song: “Hey Jude”
Which version is better?
Verdict:
Taymor
Reason: The new one is somewhat shorter than eternity.
16) Song: “Lucy in the Sky With Diamonds”
Which version is better?
Verdict:
Original
Reason: Bigger, broader and more ethereal, Taymor’s version lacks focus.
Derrik • Sep 25, 2009 at 8:49 am
On the other hand, Bono is fresh like week-old salmon.
This line made me laugh.
Derrik • Sep 25, 2009 at 3:49 pm
On the other hand, Bono is fresh like week-old salmon.
This line made me laugh.
Evan • Sep 25, 2009 at 8:47 am
I would agree with all of these except “Come Together”… the original version is the clear winner in my mind.
Evan • Sep 25, 2009 at 3:47 pm
I would agree with all of these except “Come Together”… the original version is the clear winner in my mind.
Babysitting • Sep 4, 2009 at 9:00 am
Such a great CD! Though I’m a huge fan of the originals as well, I loved the artistic license they took with the movie. Thumbs up.
Babysitting • Sep 4, 2009 at 4:00 pm
Such a great CD! Though I’m a huge fan of the originals as well, I loved the artistic license they took with the movie. Thumbs up.
Heather Billings • May 8, 2008 at 4:44 pm
The Collegian Staff Comment
The simple and unsatisfying answer is that we don’t know. My personal guess is that it is linked to from some popular site or that it comes up relatively high in a search for Across the Universe. No figure-tampering.
Heather Billings • May 8, 2008 at 11:44 pm
The Collegian Staff Comment
The simple and unsatisfying answer is that we don’t know. My personal guess is that it is linked to from some popular site or that it comes up relatively high in a search for Across the Universe. No figure-tampering.
Chest Rockwell • May 8, 2008 at 2:12 pm
how is the the all-time most read Collegian article? Someone is tampering with the figures.
Chest Rockwell • May 8, 2008 at 9:12 pm
how is the the all-time most read Collegian article? Someone is tampering with the figures.
Benjamin Baxter • Oct 11, 2007 at 12:44 pm
The Collegian Staff Writer
I think very much of the originals, and it doesn’t help that the sampling of songs used in the movie is hardly a cross-sampling of The Beatles’ greatest songs.
If it had tried to be, where’s “When I’m Sixty-Four” or anything else from Sgt. Pepper’s? Where’s the larger part of Revolver or Rubber Soul?
Why the emphasis on lesser songs from The Beatles (The White Album) and Magical Mystery Tour mixed along with a few early hits that don’t even compare to The Beatles’ best?
The reason I was even interested in the movie was for the use of “Girl” at the beginning of the trailer. So I checked out the soundtrack.
I understand your point about the marching band, but that’s nonetheless irrelevant. I was a fan of The Beatles long before I even touched a trombone, and what music professors think have nothing to do with me.
Benjamin Baxter • Oct 11, 2007 at 7:44 pm
The Collegian Staff Writer
I think very much of the originals, and it doesn’t help that the sampling of songs used in the movie is hardly a cross-sampling of The Beatles’ greatest songs.
If it had tried to be, where’s “When I’m Sixty-Four” or anything else from Sgt. Pepper’s? Where’s the larger part of Revolver or Rubber Soul?
Why the emphasis on lesser songs from The Beatles (The White Album) and Magical Mystery Tour mixed along with a few early hits that don’t even compare to The Beatles’ best?
The reason I was even interested in the movie was for the use of “Girl” at the beginning of the trailer. So I checked out the soundtrack.
I understand your point about the marching band, but that’s nonetheless irrelevant. I was a fan of The Beatles long before I even touched a trombone, and what music professors think have nothing to do with me.
Whatever • Oct 10, 2007 at 2:13 pm
Marching Band must have warped your brain into thinking it’s OK to compare world-changing music recorded almost 50 ago to some lame cover project.
And it must have warped your brain into thinking cover acts matter, since you guys play standards.
Sure, in some instances they can get big, and many cover bands make a good living. But “while still carving out their own niche in pop music history” ? Yeah right.
I’m sure Pavarotti could sing better than Lennon, too, but saying some lame cover versions of Beatles songs are even worthy of being compared to the originals is ridiculous!
Obviously you don’t think of much of The Beatles, and I’ve seen Fresno State music professors profess the same sentiments. I think a watchdog committee needs to be formed to address this alarming trend.
Whatever • Oct 10, 2007 at 9:13 pm
Marching Band must have warped your brain into thinking it’s OK to compare world-changing music recorded almost 50 ago to some lame cover project.
And it must have warped your brain into thinking cover acts matter, since you guys play standards.
Sure, in some instances they can get big, and many cover bands make a good living. But “while still carving out their own niche in pop music history” ? Yeah right.
I’m sure Pavarotti could sing better than Lennon, too, but saying some lame cover versions of Beatles songs are even worthy of being compared to the originals is ridiculous!
Obviously you don’t think of much of The Beatles, and I’ve seen Fresno State music professors profess the same sentiments. I think a watchdog committee needs to be formed to address this alarming trend.