We̢۪re not sure if you̢۪ve heard, but the elections for next year̢۪s Associated Students executives and senators occurred last week. Voting took place last Tuesday through last Thursday, and during the course of those three days, 494 student votes were cast, averaging about 166 votes each day.
While there are a few instances where 494 might qualify as a large number — say, the number of mouths to feed at a wedding — it is an absolutely dismal number when talking about an election for a group of people responsible for making decisions on behalf of the student body about how our funds should be allocated.
Indeed, in relation to the approximately 22,000 students currently enrolled at Fresno State, 494 voters comprise about 2.2 percent of the population of the school. This is a precipitous drop from last year̢۪s election turnout, which still drew only 1,398 voters (about 6.4 percent of the school).
Indeed, turnout was so bad that there were several candidates elected with fewer than 10 votes.
The poor turnout seems to be the result of several factors — there seemed to be a marked lack of campaigning this year as compared to previous elections. The number of candidates was also considerably less than in years past, with most candidates running unopposed. Taken together, these issues point to what may be the larger problem — student apathy, on all fronts.
BayDog • May 15, 2007 at 1:06 am
I am with many people in concern to this issue; that a failure of AS to properly announce the campaign period needs to be highlighted. However, this is not the only reason.
I believe that the factor of a new editor in chief of The Collegian must be taken into account. Being a candidate for AS Senator last year, I saw The Collegian take a more active role in publicizing the AS campaign. In our modern society, media is a the third factor that keeps the public informed. Moreover, I am sure that if anyone opted to look at the AS website, they would see dates posted for election application deadlines. But would more campaign coverage lead to varying results?
The answer here is “not really.” In studying politics and election tendencies, I can tell you that the candidates who are usually elected happen to be those already in power; the incumbents. Not only do they have the advantage of “Name ID,” they also are favored by the constituents they are representing. So, had anyone ran against JP or Russel or any of the other incumbents, they most likely would have lost anyway. I am not trying to dissuade anyone from running. I am only trying to inform the readers what the likely scenarios happen to be.
If anyone does want to get involved in the student government at Fresno State, I highly suggest applying for a committee position, if not an AS Senator position if someone decides to relinquish their seat.
BayDog • May 15, 2007 at 8:06 am
I am with many people in concern to this issue; that a failure of AS to properly announce the campaign period needs to be highlighted. However, this is not the only reason.
I believe that the factor of a new editor in chief of The Collegian must be taken into account. Being a candidate for AS Senator last year, I saw The Collegian take a more active role in publicizing the AS campaign. In our modern society, media is a the third factor that keeps the public informed. Moreover, I am sure that if anyone opted to look at the AS website, they would see dates posted for election application deadlines. But would more campaign coverage lead to varying results?
The answer here is “not really.” In studying politics and election tendencies, I can tell you that the candidates who are usually elected happen to be those already in power; the incumbents. Not only do they have the advantage of “Name ID,” they also are favored by the constituents they are representing. So, had anyone ran against JP or Russel or any of the other incumbents, they most likely would have lost anyway. I am not trying to dissuade anyone from running. I am only trying to inform the readers what the likely scenarios happen to be.
If anyone does want to get involved in the student government at Fresno State, I highly suggest applying for a committee position, if not an AS Senator position if someone decides to relinquish their seat.
Logan • May 3, 2007 at 12:01 am
I’m completely with Bryan on this one – I had no idea when the deadline for candidacy was. I had no idea when voting would be until after that deadline had passed and I heard no one was running.
As far as I’m concerned, this is a complete and utter failure on the AS’ part to advertise. I really hope there aren’t any political science majors in that group of students. They should know better.
I honestly couldn’t tell you a single thing about anyone involved in student government. I see names and they mean nothing to me. Why should I open up the voting guide when by the time it gets to that point I still don’t know anything? I don’t even know the basic platform upon which their campaigns are built.
For my part, I’m not sitting here wallowing in apathy over our student government – I am so disgusted with their clear lack of foresight and planning and enthusiasm that I won’t provide them the satisfaction of my vote. If they won’t make the effort to convince me it’s worth my time, why should I give it to them freely?
Logan • May 3, 2007 at 7:01 am
I’m completely with Bryan on this one – I had no idea when the deadline for candidacy was. I had no idea when voting would be until after that deadline had passed and I heard no one was running.
As far as I’m concerned, this is a complete and utter failure on the AS’ part to advertise. I really hope there aren’t any political science majors in that group of students. They should know better.
I honestly couldn’t tell you a single thing about anyone involved in student government. I see names and they mean nothing to me. Why should I open up the voting guide when by the time it gets to that point I still don’t know anything? I don’t even know the basic platform upon which their campaigns are built.
For my part, I’m not sitting here wallowing in apathy over our student government – I am so disgusted with their clear lack of foresight and planning and enthusiasm that I won’t provide them the satisfaction of my vote. If they won’t make the effort to convince me it’s worth my time, why should I give it to them freely?
JD • Apr 30, 2007 at 5:06 pm
i’d write another long post just so i could sprinkle in a bunch more references to the BS, but i don’t want to waste my time on an issue nobody cares about.
JD • May 1, 2007 at 12:06 am
i’d write another long post just so i could sprinkle in a bunch more references to the BS, but i don’t want to waste my time on an issue nobody cares about.
Mike Greyson • Apr 30, 2007 at 3:30 pm
Well done, AS—-you managed to de-legitimize the student elections at CSU Fresno. Yeah, if you keep the student body uninformed and run one ad in the school paper, your buddies and their friends will attain their seats in uncontested elections. So, we are to believe AS student reps will accurately and representatively adhere to the wishes of the others students? I think that answer is a clear ‘no’.
Mike Greyson • Apr 30, 2007 at 10:30 pm
Well done, AS—-you managed to de-legitimize the student elections at CSU Fresno. Yeah, if you keep the student body uninformed and run one ad in the school paper, your buddies and their friends will attain their seats in uncontested elections. So, we are to believe AS student reps will accurately and representatively adhere to the wishes of the others students? I think that answer is a clear ‘no’.
Bryan Harley • Apr 30, 2007 at 1:16 pm
Personally, I feel the blame rests with Associated Students. They didn’t make a great effort to inform the student body about deadlines to apply for candidacy. Sure they put out advertisements about when and where to vote, but the damage had been done. Hardly anyone was running, nearly all races were uncontested.
The voting dates dictate when the deadline for candidacy is set. And probably due to poor planning, this deadline was immediately after spring break. Really only existing AS representatives could be well-aware of this date, at least that’s how it appears to me. Just a bit unfair…
Bryan Harley • Apr 30, 2007 at 8:16 pm
Personally, I feel the blame rests with Associated Students. They didn’t make a great effort to inform the student body about deadlines to apply for candidacy. Sure they put out advertisements about when and where to vote, but the damage had been done. Hardly anyone was running, nearly all races were uncontested.
The voting dates dictate when the deadline for candidacy is set. And probably due to poor planning, this deadline was immediately after spring break. Really only existing AS representatives could be well-aware of this date, at least that’s how it appears to me. Just a bit unfair…
Hm • Apr 30, 2007 at 8:06 pm
I admit it’s a lousy stance. I just have a hard time getting excited about anything there.
I don’t agree with everything I typed earlier, but I can see how many would – at least enough to not vote on the seemingly pointless AS Elections.
And at the same time, it’s hard to get excited about candidates just looking for resume-building to help get into the great disgusting world of politics. Yuck.
I just don’t see the current plans at the university as a real beacon of progress. AS seems like such small potatoes.
Maybe it’s more difficult to report on, but I’d like to read stories about education.
Hm • Apr 30, 2007 at 1:06 pm
I admit it’s a lousy stance. I just have a hard time getting excited about anything there.
I don’t agree with everything I typed earlier, but I can see how many would – at least enough to not vote on the seemingly pointless AS Elections.
And at the same time, it’s hard to get excited about candidates just looking for resume-building to help get into the great disgusting world of politics. Yuck.
I just don’t see the current plans at the university as a real beacon of progress. AS seems like such small potatoes.
Maybe it’s more difficult to report on, but I’d like to read stories about education.
FSDogs1 • Apr 30, 2007 at 12:24 pm
Just because you won’t get to use the library, or go to the rec center anymore, doesn’t mean you shouldn’t care. What kind of attitude is that?
Why not be proud that during your time as a student you’ve done things, experienced things and helped passed referendums that will make Fresno State a better university when you graduate than it was when you got there!?
I was a freshman when the vote went through for the rec center. And guess what? It opened just months after my May graduation. I never got to enjoy it as a student. But I still drive by it and smile. It makes me happy the current students have it.
Sure, I would like to be allowed in (at least for a small membership fee) as alumni, but not getting in isn’t going to curb my enthusiasm for seeing my alma mater prosper.
FSDogs1 • Apr 30, 2007 at 7:24 pm
Just because you won’t get to use the library, or go to the rec center anymore, doesn’t mean you shouldn’t care. What kind of attitude is that?
Why not be proud that during your time as a student you’ve done things, experienced things and helped passed referendums that will make Fresno State a better university when you graduate than it was when you got there!?
I was a freshman when the vote went through for the rec center. And guess what? It opened just months after my May graduation. I never got to enjoy it as a student. But I still drive by it and smile. It makes me happy the current students have it.
Sure, I would like to be allowed in (at least for a small membership fee) as alumni, but not getting in isn’t going to curb my enthusiasm for seeing my alma mater prosper.
Hm • Apr 30, 2007 at 12:09 pm
seems that one of the main reasons for such low turnout and high apathy is because the goal is to GET OUT of Fresno State instead of really caring about what happens to it.
We already have a library we won’t get to use, plenty of construction for stuff we won’t bother with, a fancy schmancy rec center we helped paid for but can’t use once we graduate, and tons of student loans as soon as we finally get out.
We vote for a lot of stuff we won’t be able to care about.
Hm • Apr 30, 2007 at 7:09 pm
seems that one of the main reasons for such low turnout and high apathy is because the goal is to GET OUT of Fresno State instead of really caring about what happens to it.
We already have a library we won’t get to use, plenty of construction for stuff we won’t bother with, a fancy schmancy rec center we helped paid for but can’t use once we graduate, and tons of student loans as soon as we finally get out.
We vote for a lot of stuff we won’t be able to care about.